
Shades
Black and white
Why hast thou forsaken me?
No color
The rainbow does not fill the page
All the discourse seems black and white
Where are the shades?
Nuance paints within the greys
Stark lines
No curves or bends
Inorganic
Artificial
Not like the tides or the waves
It makes me sad
Like Jesus within the garden
He wept
Shades
Black and white
No color
The rainbow does not fill the page
Stark Lines
No curves or bends
Just a touch of sadness
With a bit of
shades
This was a very interesting prompt by dVerse. I recommend you click the link and read through it. To summarize the prompt was to write a poem about one of the pictures contained within the prompt. After writing the poem go to the second part. The interesting kicker is the second part. The paintings are by Emil Nolde a German artist of the 1930’s and 1940’s. Who rose to fame after WWII by proclaiming himself as being oppressed by the Nazis when in fact it was later discovered he was an ardent supporter of the Nazis. He was basically a oafish, belligerent, who took any position that would get himself the most gain.
The prompt then asked: Are the colors and feelings the same? Does the artwork have a new story? And, finally, are we separate from what we create?
For me I find the colors and artwork the same and the words of the poem I wrote remain the same but the meaning switches. I find it very interesting how the poem fits what I learned about the artist and the feelings they create. The story is not new per se but the overlay of the story changed. Now instead of being a general application it became specific to the artist; yet I can step back and see the original overlay of this being about any person or a general sense as well.
For me, the art is separate from the artist, in that, without knowing the artist or the artist’s story, the art is still there and still speaks. Yet the artist is also intrinsically part of the art, in that, the art is an expression of something within the artist, personal or otherwise. That expression is unique to the artist. Who the artist is is within their art.
I hope you enjoyed the poem! ☺
Bravo,
i did think of the Holy Grail when i looked at that image.
much♡love
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a great interpretation of the painting, Stew!
Yvette M Calleiro 🙂
http://yvettemcalleiro.blogspot.com
LikeLiked by 1 person
yep, no rainbow in that painting (or apparently, in Nolde’s soul … hah!). i like how you “worked” the Jesus theme into your poem (wept in the garden, why has thou forsaken me). captivating 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
You give me an enhanced perspective on this piece. Someone else saw the Jesus aspect in here. Well-articulated afterword, Stew.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Before reading the article I was more of the though ahh the artist is doing the beard, kind of long hair messiah type look, kind of has a bit of Jesus vibe. After reading it was more of the that was definitely more intentional, for a woe is me, persecuted type look. Same kind of feel but different motivations.
Thank you for reading and glad you enjoyed!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah! You’re welcome.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Although I did not like this painting, I enjoyed your ekphrastic poem, Stew, and I think we came to the same decision about Nolde. I love the phrase ‘nuance paints within the greys’, and it is ‘artifical / not like the tides or the waves’, with ‘just a touch of sadness’. I also agree when you say, ‘the art is separate from the artist, in that, without knowing the artist or the artist’s story, the art is still there and still speaks. Yet the artist is also intrinsically part of the art, in that, the art is an expression of something within the artist, personal or otherwise. That expression is unique to the artist.’
LikeLiked by 1 person
I enjoyed the stark drama in your words very much, and your comments after too. Thank you, really good stuff.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I enjoyed your response to the prompt. Yes the art still speaks whether we know the artist or not.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s my thought. Now whether you choose to consume more of that artists art or patronize him or her that’s up to you. I’m glad you enjoyed it. ☺
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I do agree with your response!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I very much appreciate you sharing your experience, that the art remained the same for you, and the poem, just with somewhat different meaning. I had mostly the same experience, just that I saw a deeper sadness in the painting after I learned more about the artist.
I like your synopsis of parts. The art is separate, yet the artist is a part of their art. It’s fascinating to me. Thanks for participating!
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure. It was an interesting prompt and thought provoking. Thank you very much for the comments.
LikeLiked by 1 person